Tuesday, December 21, 2010

Blogging from iGoogle and Gmail

Blogging from iGoogle and Gmail

MANMOHAN SINGH MADE A STATEMENT THAT HE IS READY TO STAND IN FRONT OF PAC

MANISH TIWARY WHO BOASTS OF READING OF HISTORY-TELL HIM TO TELL DIG VIJAY SINGH TO KNOW ABOUT THE PARTITION HOLOCAST BEFORE ACCUSING SHRI LAL KRISHNA ADVANI- PARTITION CRIME CAUSED A HUGE DIVIDE BETWEEN HINDUS AND MUSLIMS- FROM INDIAN SIDE IT WAS NEHRU WHO WAS RESPONSIBLE!!!!! MILLIONS BUTCHERED DURING PARTITION.
RS 490000 CRORES BELONGS TO EVERY INDIAN AND IT IS DURING CONGRESS AND DRAVIDIAN PERIOD THE LOOT HAS TAKEN PLACE.
FIRST GET BACK- POK-COT AND THE SAID AMOUNT AND THEN TALK- It is the DUO which is Responsible.

KAPIL SIBAL YOU GO AND FIGHT WITH BJP ELSEWHERE- WE INDIANS WANT AN EXPLANATION!!!
THE NEXT BIG SCAM WILL BE THE EVM SCAM- THE NATIONS KNOWS THE UPA WITCH HUNTING AGAINST THE RESEARCHERS!!!

MANMOHAN SINGH MADE A STATEMENT THAT HE IS READY TO STAND IN FRONT OF PAC- AND NDTV/TIMESNOW- WENT GAGA- Saying never had it happend that PM stood before like This- It is also a Fact No PM Was APPOINTED BY AN ITALIAN AND ALL THE PM's if am right have Got Elected to Lok Sabha not entered from the RS. It is A NATIONAL SHAME THAT A EURPEON COUNTRY WAS THROWN OUT OF THE COUNTRY AND NOW ANOTHER EURPEON APPOINTS OUR PRIME MINISTER. What did PC say - Number Nahin aya- Right- His Number also did not Arrive in the EVM as Alledged!!!!!


HERE IS A CASE OF SWADESHI POCKET MARS VS VIDESHI LOTERAS.
WHAT ABOUT THE HARSHAD MEHTA SCAM = WHO WAS RESPONSIBLE- CAN U SCRATCH THE GREY MATTER ABOVE?
WHAT ABOUT THE PRESIDENTS HUSBAND- WHO IS COUGHT IN A LAND GRABBING INCIDENT- WHY YOU ARE NOT RAISING THIS ISSUE.
WHY IS UPA AFTER THE EVM RESEARCHERS- WHERE AS U TALK ABOUT THE WITCH HUNTING OF TEHELKA?
IF YOU HAVE THE GUTS AND ALL YOUR COLEAGUES LET US SEE YOU FILE A DEFAMATION CASE AGAINST SHRI SUBRAMANIAM SWAMY FOR THE FOLLOWING UTUBE

WILL NDTV-TIMESNOW-IBN-HEADLINES TELECAST THE OPEN TELECAST- THEY WILL SHIT BRICKS
WHO SHIPPED ALL THE ANTIQUES TO ITALY- ANTIQUE SMUGGLING.
UNDERSTAN ITALY HAS RECENTLY CRACKED ON FOREIGN TERRORISTS RECENTLY-around 36 of them which will spill the Beans in the coming days.
WHY CONGRESS .
THE NATION KNOWS WHY CONGRESS DOES NOT WANT JPC-WELL THE GOVERNMENT WILL FALL IN ALL PROBABILITY-READ BELOW
IS SCARRED TO FILE A DEFAMATION CASE AGAINST SHRI SUBRAMANIAM SWAMY? 
You always Harp Tehelka-WHAT ABOUT Nagarwala Case, Mundra Case, Bofors, Union Carbide Massacre,Jeep Scandel??? The List is Long
Once Compiled will be circulated. Read belpow Opinion Poll about Sonias Laud Thinking to Stem Corruption!!!!

FOR ALL YOU SONIA'sCHAMCHAS
http://www.youtube.com/watch? v=84fkL6yB1X8&annotation_id= annotation_132410&feature=iv

http://www.youtube.com/watch? annotation_id=annotation_ 365070&v=WYwQkhWMXIQ&feature= iv

What about the Letters to MANMOHAN SINGH FROM SHRI SUBRAMANIAM SWAMY REGARDING SONIA AND YOU-Which is widely Circulated?
LET US SEE YOU PROCEED WITH REGARD TO ABOVE AGAINST THE PERSON SPEAKING. You Talk of Witch Hunting- What about the 100 Million Dollar Suit which SONIA FILED IN US AND THE CASE GOT THROWN OUT. What about the pilot who was Sacked in Kerala just because He took Photograph.
We all know the Frustration of BIHAR LOSS, RAJASTHAN PANCHAYAT ELECTION LOSS, GUJARAT PANCHAYA ELECTION LOSS, WESTBENGAL PANCHAYAT ELECTION LOSS- NOW 2G, CWG,HOUSING SCAM, ETC.
BOTTOM LINE CONGRESS AND DRAVIDIANS ARE FINISHED AND IT WILL TAKE ANOTHER SEVERAL YEARS- MAY YOU START A DANDI MARCH AGAINST SONIA AND NON COOPERATION MOVEMENT AGAINST HER!!!

The Last Two Days Congress conducted SONIA Bachao PROGRAM in the Name of 125 Years of Congress- The Back Ground Photo Had Larger Photo of Sonia than Most of the Leaders- Shows the Disrepect to The Freedom Fighters.

KAPIL Sibal tries To Hide "THE 40 DACOITS BEHIND FEW POCKET MARS alias PICKPOCKETERS". Tehelka- The Nation Did Not Loose Money, In Coffin Scam India Didnot Lose Money- HERE THERE IS MASS LOOTING AND THE MONEY HAS GONE OUT INDIAN AND WHAT ABOUT BOFORS- The Governor who is AFTER YEDURAPPA=WAS HE NOT RESPONSIBLE IN ALLOWING THE ITALIAN DIRTY SCOUNDRAL SCUM BAG- QUOTROCHI TO WALK OF SEVERAL CRORES?

'Congress leaders in race to make wild charges'
Press Trust of India, Updated: December 17, 2010 14:23 IST

The Rashtriya Swayamsewak Sangh (RSS) slammed Rahul Gandhi for his "shocking" remarks against Hindu groups, saying there was a "race" in the senior Congress leadership to project Hindus as terrorists.
"It is shocking that there is a race in the senior Congress leadership to indirectly or directly support jehadi terror and to project Hindus as terrorists in this country, that too in gross violation of established diplomatic norms and procedures," senior RSS leader Ram Madhav said.
According to Wikileaks, Gandhi had told US Ambassador Timothy Roemer that growth of radicalised Hindu groups was a bigger threat than Lashkar-e-Taiba.
"Going to a foreign ambassador and talking with him about India's international issues is most shocking. It only betrays utter lack of knowledge of Indian reality as well as lack of knowledge of government diplomatic practices in a person who aspires to be whatever in this country tomorrow," Madhav said.
He alleged that Gandhi was making "wild charges" against Hindus.
Wikileaks has exposed how Congress has no qualms in using religion and caste and exploiting these sentiments for electoral gains, he alleged.
 "There is no secret now about Congress' politics of religion," he said.
The RSS leader was referring to Roemer's predecessor David Mulford's remarks, who had said that Congress planned to polarise the electorate on religious and caste lines to gain votes, according to Wikileaks.

Source :  http://www.ndtv.com/article/india/congress-leaders-in-race-to-make-wild-charges-73169
Daijiworld Media Network – Mangalore (SP)
Mangalore, Dec 20: State Chief Minister, B S Yeddyurappa, said that a campaign, ‘Rahul Gandhi Hatao’, will be launched soon, to drive the youth Congress leader away from politics, for his remarks that Hindu society, which forms majority in the country, is terrorism-oriented. He was speaking to reporters during his visit to the city to take part in the meeting of party activists on Sunday December 19.
“Once the taluk and zilla panahcyat elections come to a close, I will hold consultations with the party leaders and party president, before initiating the said campaign. Rahul has termed Hindus as terrorists, a remark that is impossible to tolerate. We will not hesitate to launch the above campaign from Karnataka itself,” he said.
Yeddyrappa asked Sonia Gandhi to stop issuing irresponsible statements against the state government, and asked her instead, to put forth evidences and proof for her claims. He revealed that he had already written to Sonia Gandhi, explaining about the extent of land denotified during the period of former Chief Minister, S M Krishna, and the Lokayukta’s direction to recover Rs 230 crore from former Chief Minister, Dharam Singh, for violation of norms. He felt that it would be better if Sonia Gandhi gives a reply to these points, rather than levelling baseless charges. He expressed the confidence that the people will give a fitting reply to the Congress for these wrongs in the taluk and zilla panchayat elections.
He said that Bangarappa, being foresighted and intelligent, deserted the Congress party, realizing that it is a sinking ship, and congratulated the former CM for his decision. He was replying to a
question raised by a journalist. Yeddyurappa also said that he had given replies to both the letters addressed to him by the Governor, and hoped that the Governor will be satisfied with the reply. About the mining activity, he claimed that the full facts and the government decisions were known to even High Court and the Supreme Court, and felt that making unnecessary insinuations about illegal mining on himself and the ministerial colleagues, was improper

Prof Arindam Chaudhuri on 'JPC WILL ALMOST CERTAINLY GET NDA BACK TO POWER IN 2014'   
Posted by PP syndcn inc   
Monday, 20 December 2010
Arindam Chaudhuri Analyses Why BJP should not and cannot afford to give up the demand for a JPC Probe
Rs. 1,76,000 crores and counting! The scam is the biggest in the country ever – or rather, the sum total of all the other scams (that have been exposed) put together, multiplied by two and more! If not a joint parliamentary committee probe now, then when? A great democracy is one with a thriving opposition. After the last elections, I had raised a question. Is this the end of the road for the BJP for long? It looked so. BJP was stuck on its Hindutva mantra, while the Congress promised youth, which looked progressive and could connect with the masses better! After all, the Hindus themselves are so coexistential that they don’t like any communal stress in their lives. But then, complacency is the mother of all failures. And failure is the mother of all successes! Congress did two big blunders. Firstly, in a haste to promote Rahul Gandhi as its future leader – and in its fear that charismatic speakers like Jyotiradiya or Sachin Pilot or Milind Deora may overshadow the son – the Congress started destroying its biggest trump card, the youth factor, which had made it look so bright. The Congress saw to it that none of them had the courage to hog any limelight or be in any platform of importance; so much so that the public has virtually forgotten Congress’ youth brigade. And the truth is whatever the slavish media in India writes (it praises every rare semi-meaningful word that Rahul says as if it’s straight from Julius Ceaser). Rahul Gandhi, unfortunately, is still not good enough to single-handedly lead the Congress yet. Like they have done with Dr. Manmohan Singh, the Congress could have made best use of Rahul as the silent guy, while the other better speakers managed the party.
The second mistake is perhaps bigger and more dangerous. Protecting a dynasty may ruin a party but abetting corruption ruins the nation. The Congress ruined its Prime Minister Dr. Manmohan Singh’s personal image of crystal clear integrity by entering into a series of mega scams. A majority of population in India, being illiterate, doesn’t understand policies much; but they understand ‘chori’. I believe a conspiracy by V. P. Singh created a wave in India which made him the Prime Minister from a nobody, thanks only to an allegation of corruption that he could make the public believe in. Rajiv was a man of definite personal integrity and was highly progressive and had started an anti-corruption drive in India against Indian businessmen. V.P. Singh was a friend of the industry, being a past commerce minister, and catching the moment, he made the Bofors allegation. Rajiv – a man of great progressive thoughts, great charisma and a Gandhi who had earlier swept the elections on a massive sympathy wave – lost the elections. I would say for no reason but a wave around corruption that the masses were falsely made to believe. Rajiv Gandhi, I believe, was personally not corrupt (for party funds, even the most honest politician depends on sources; and Rajiv might have depended on a single alternative instead of a number of Indian businessmen). But can I say the same about the current Congress? Well, only a joker can. Everyone else knows what’s happening in the Congress. Yes, there is a Manmohan Singh who is clean. But he sits atop a pile of corrupt people. CWG, Adarsh, 2G, it goes on... personal wealth creation at its best; and wealth being stacked offshore. The Supreme Court rightly asked, was the Prime Minister sleeping? Being personally clean as a leader is only half the job done. You have to make a system that cleans up the whole system.
And in this failure of Congress to provide clean governance, comes the hope for BJP and NDA for 2014. Forget Hindutva; concentrate on the massive dacoity of India. In every sphere. The masses understand it and they are totally convinced today that the UPA has started rotting inside out. There seems to be a sudden wave in the Congress on why should Mukesh Ambani remain the only one with 3 lac crore rupees. Gone are the days of the ‘hundred crore’ ministers. If figures are to be believed, today the key ministers are raking in thousands of crores. The country is being looted and sold off to the highest bidder... Oops, I got it wrong here – the lowest bidder, to be precise, who gives the highest kickback. There is absolutely no reason for anyone to accept and tolerate this. And this is where the need of opposition in a democracy comes in. The BJP needs to keep up its demand for a JPC probe. Take to the streets but the JPC is a must. And the probe must be totally transparent with complete media access during hearings. That’s the way it happened in Watergate, the Iran Contra, the Clinton case. That’s how it happens in real democracies. With the Assange case, it’s clear that America is unfairly using ownership of web domains – controlled by America – to close down various websites in order to hound and shut off WikiLeaks. India could lead the way in showing what a democracy is about for a change.
The JPC is also the only way everyone can be brought to the questioning table. Every other agency can be manipulated and managed in this country by the party in power. As I wrote in my previous editorial on the Radia tapes, the Indian media is right now too busy doing what it does best: go behind glamourised cases and magnify them to grab eyeballs and totally mislead and misinform the public. The part which was leaked till then proved nothing. There are lobbyists everywhere. The real issue here is that the government is caught in a web of corruption – perhaps facilitated by a lobbyist. Here we are talking about the issue of Rs.1,76,000 crores; and there we are speaking of a few stories that were being attempted to be planted here and there... What a mind blowing diversion from the real issue. It’s hilarious the way the media is happily going on and on bashing individual journalists (glamourous, easy preys and perfect vent for pent up jealousies), who cannot hit back, instead of hitting out at the real people who are behind this scam. What the opposition and media need to do right now is demand for the JPC probe, for that’s what the Indian masses need and want. Of course, a few weeks back, I myself wrote that our Parliamentarians have no right to waste the taxpayers’ money due to non-functioning of the Parliament. But as the magnitude of the scam gets unearthed, it’s clear that there’s more of tax payers’ money at stake in the scam than in the non-functioning of the Parliament. The masses, the tax payers, they have a right to a clean regime and the opposition must help them get their rights. That’s what makes a functional propeople democracy. And why not? After all, this perhaps is the sure-shot route for the NDA to be back in power in 2014 – as I said, nothing works with the aam junta better than the corruption plank.
Let’s get in a little bit of analytics here. There are two ways in which Congress can hope that UPA comes to power in 2014 with Rahul Gandhi as PM: first, it takes the ekla chalo route and either gets 272 seats or gets very close to it. The second is through allies. The ekla chalo route looked very promising in 2009 when the Congress won 22 Lok Sabha seats in UP. But that magic figure of 272 now looks unattainable. Look at some numbers first. The Congress has 7 out of 7 seats in Delhi, 9 out of 10 in Haryana, 5 out of 5 in Uttarakhand, 8 out of 12 in Punjab, 33 out of 42 in Andhra Pradesh, 30 plus out of 48 along with NCP in Maharashtra, 11 out of 26 in Gujarat, 6 out of 26 in Karnataka, 13 out of 20 in Kerala, 12 out of 29 in Madhya Pradesh and 20 out of 25 in Rajasthan. The only states in which Congress can improve its tally is Bihar (now 2 out of 40), Jharkhand (now 1 out of 14), Orissa (now 6 out of 21). In West Bengal and Tamil Nadu, it will play second fiddle to allies.
The fact is, a resurgent NDA could actually lead to Congress losing seats in many states. Then, it has a virtually zero base in Bihar, Bengal and Tamil Nadu. It will suffer from a huge backlash in Andhra. In Orissa, Jharkhand, Gujarat, Madhya Pradesh and Bihar, it has been out of power for so long that it has forgotten how to win. Most importantly, in key states like Bihar, Chattisgarh, MP, Gujarat, Orissa, Tamil Nadu, Bengal, Jharkhand, it has absolutely no state level mass leader who can capture imagination and votes. YSR in Andhra, Amarinder Singh in Punjab, Ashok Gehlot in Rajasthan and Sheila Dixit in Delhi did the trick in 2009. YSR is gone and the others can only do so much. In the event, it appears very unlikely that the Congress will get more than 200 seats in the 2014 Lok Sabha elections. So it has to depend on allies like Trinamool, DMK (or AIIDMK), JMM, NCP and assorted communal parties – all of whom have strained ties with the Congress.
In contrast, the NDA alliance looks formidable and could gain members by 2014. The Bihar election has been an eye-opener for parties who thought they will lose minority votes if they ally with the BJP – the stigma of the 2002 Gujarat riots. This had prompted allies like AGP, BJD, Trinamool and Telugu Desam to ditch the BJP. But Nitish Kumar has clearly demonstrated that Muslims can and will vote for the NDA. Why, even hundreds of Muslim candidates have won local elections in Gujarat on a BJP ticket! If the UPA 2 keeps getting mired in scandals and problems created by allies, a chastened BJP might just go back to rope in strong allies like Telugu Desam, BJD etc. If the BJP manages to do that, sheer arithmetic of vote percentages will also ensure that the NDA will head for a majority in 2014. A strong stance against corruption of the current government will only make the case stronger.
The key issue is: The Congress has two great nationwide vote catchers; and popular figures in Rahul and Sonia Gandhi at the centre. But barring isolated cases like Ashok Gehlot, they have hardly any charismatic state level leaders with a mass base. The reverse is true of the BJP – they have very popular mass leaders like Raman Singh, Prem Dhumal, Shivraj Chauhan, Narendra Modi etc at the state level but no Vajpayee-like charismatic leader at the centre. While for Congress, the job is far tougher (that is, of finding local leaders), for NDA, it’s just about coming to a consensus and rallying behind one leader like Narendra Modi or Nitish Kumar etc.
Then again, an NDA victory could be a blessing in disguise for Rahul Gandhi who is still very young by Indian standards – and as I have said in the past as well, he needs to learn a lot about communication techniques looking at videos of his father, grandmother and great grandfather. People will forgive an ageing Vajpayee or Manmohan Singh for their lack of powerful communication, but never a young man his age. A prolonged absence from power at the Centre has helped Sonia Gandhi rebuild the Congress step by step the hard way. If Rahul Gandhi gets the PM’s throne on a platter, there is a danger of him going further on the current waywith cronies abusing his personal repute and ultimately damaging him. A stint as opposition leader will give him time to finish the party rebuilding process that he has started.
All in all, given the massive corruption and scams that the UPA is getting drowned into, perhaps we should get used to the idea of an NDA government in 2014. And going by the performance of the earlier NDA government, there is nothing wrong with that. The only thing it has to do is grab the opportunities – like enforce the JPC – and of course, the magnitude of the scam being so big, they should not have some of their leaders sharing the booty and being bought off for a price; then the loot will continue in peace. Else, it could be NDA in 2014!

Mataramhttp://expressbuzz.com/edition/pollresult.aspx?R1=No

Do you believe Sonia Gandhi and Rahul Gandhi will act against the corrupt?

Thursday, December 16, 2010

The Hindu : News / National : India, Israel should work together in fighting terrorism: Gadkari

The Hindu : News / National : India, Israel should work together in fighting terrorism: Gadkari

“The Nehru Dynasty”, astrologer K. N. Rao‘Reminiscences of the Nehru Age’ M. O. Mathai Yunus book, ‘Persons, Passions & Polities’

GANDHI’S FAMILY TREE WORTH SPENDING 15 MINUTES TO READ

At the very beginning of his book, “The Nehru Dynasty”, astrologer K. N. Rao mentions the names of Jawahar Lal’s father and grandfather. Jawahar Lal’s father was believed to be Moti Lal and Moti Lal’s father was one Gangadhar Nehru. And we all know that Jawahar Lal’s only daughter was Indira Priyadarshini Nehru, Kamala Nehru was her mother, who died in Switzerland of tuberculosis. She was totally against Indira’s proposed marriage with Feroze. Why? No one tells us that Now, who is this Feroze? We are told by many he was the son of the family grocer. The grocer supplied wines etc. to Anand Bhavan, preciously known as Ishrat Manzil, which once belonged to a Muslim lawyer named Mobarak Ali. Moti Lal was earlier an employee of Mobarak Ali. What was the family grocer’s name? One frequently hears that Rajiv Gandhi’s grandfather was Pandit Nehru. But then we all know that everyone has two grandfathers, the paternal and the material grandfather. In fact, the paternal grandfather is deemed to be the more important grandfather in most societies. Why is it then nowhere we find Rajiv Gandhi’s paternal grandfather’s name? It appears that the reason is simply this Rajiv Gandhi’s paternal grandfather was a Muslim gentleman from the Junagadh area of Gujrat. This Muslim grocer by the name of Nawab Khan, had married a Parsi woman after converting her to Islam. This is the source where from the myth of Rajiv being a Parsi was derived. Rajiv’s father Feroze was Feroze Khan before he married Indira, against Kamala Nehru’s wishes. Feroze mother’s family name was Ghandy, often associated with Parsis and this was changed to Gandhi, sometime before his wedding with Indira by an affidavit. The fact of the matter is that (and this fact can be found in many writings) Indira was very lonely. Chased out of the Shantiniketan University by Guru Dev Rabindranath himself for misdemeanor, the lonely girl was an by herself while father Jawahar was busy with polities pretty women and illicit sex; the mother was in hospital. Feroze Khan, the grocer’s son was then in England and he was quite sympathetic to Indira and soon enough she changed her religion, became a Muslim women and married Feroze Khan in a London mosque. Nehru was not happy; Kamala was dead already or dying. The news of this married eventually reached Mohandas Karan Chand Gandhi. Gandhi urgently called Nehru and practically ordered him to ask the young man to change his name from Khan to Gandhi. It had nothing to do with change of religion, from Islam to Hindustan for instance. It was just a case of a change of name by an affidavit. And so Feroze Khan became Feroze Gandhi. The surprising thing is that the apostle of truth, the old man soon to be declared India’s Mahatma and the ‘Father of the Nation’ didn’t mention this game of his in the famous book. ‘My Experiments with Truth’ Why? When they returned to India, a mock ‘Vedic marriage’ was instituted for public consumption. On the subject, writes M. O. Mathai (a longtime private secretary of Nehru) in his renowned (but now suppressed by the GOI) ‘Reminiscences of the Nehru Age’ on page no. 94, second paragraph: “For some inexplicable reason, Nehru allowed the marriage to be performed according to Vedic rited in 1942. An inter-religious and inter-caste marriage Vedic rites at that time was not valid in law. To be legal, it had to be a civil marriage. It’s a known fact that after Rajiv’s birth Indira and Feroze lived separately, but they were not divorced. Feroze used to harass Nehru frequently for money and also interfere in Nehru’s political activities. Nehru got fed up and left instructions not to allow him into the Prime Minister’s residence Trimurthi Bhavan. Mathai writes that the death of Feroze came as a relief to Nehru and Indira. The death of Feroze in 1960 before he could consolidate his own political force, is itself a mystery. Feroze had even planned to remarry. Those who try to keep tabs on our lenders in spite of all the suppressions and deliberate misinformation are aware of the fact that the second son Indira (or Mrs. Feroze Khan) known as Sanjay Gandhi was not the son of Feroze. He was the son of another Moslem gentleman, Mohammad Yunus. Here in passing, we might that the second son was originally named Sanjeev. It rhymed with Rajiv, the elder brother’s name. It was claimed to Sanjeev when he was arrested by the British police in England and his passport impounded, for having stolen a car. Krishna Menon was then India’s High Commissioner in London. He offered to issue another passport to the felon who changed his name to Sanjay. Incidentally, Sanjay’s marriage with the Sikh girl Menaka (now they call her Maneka for Indira Gandhi found the name of Lord Indra’s court dancer rather offensivet) took place quite surprisingly in Mohammad Yunus house in New Delhi. And the marriage with Manaka who was a model (She had modeled for Bombay Dyeing wearing just a towel) was not so ordinary either. Sanjay was notorious in getting unwed young women pregnant. Menaka too was rendered pregnant by Sanjay. It was then that her father. Colonel Anand threatened Sanjay with dire consequences if he did not marry her daughter. And that did the trick. Sanjay married Menaka. It was widely reported in Delhi at the time that Mohammad Yunus was unhappy at the marriage of Sanjay with Menaka; apparently he had wanted to get him married with a Muslim girl of his choice. It was Mohammad Yunus who carried the most when Sanjay died in the plane accident. In Yunus book, ‘Persons, Passions & Polities’ one discovers that baby Sanjay had been circumcised following Islamic custom, although the reason stated was phimosis. It was always believed that Sanjay used to blackmail Indira Gandhi and due to this she used to turn a blind eye when Sanjay Gandhi started to run the country as though if were his personal fiefdom. Was he black mailing her with the secret of who his real father was? When the news of Sanjay’s death reaches Indira Gandhi, the first thing she wanted to know was about the bunch of keys which Sanjay had with him. Nehru was no less a player in producing bastards. At least one case is very graphically described by M. O. Mathai in his “Reminiscences of the Nehru Age” page 206. Muthai writes: “In the antumn of 1948 ( India became free in 1947 and a great deal of work needed to be done) a young woman from Benares arrived in New Delhi as a sanyasin named Shraddha Mata ( an assumed and not a real name). She was a Sanskrit Scholar well versed in the ancient Indian scriptures and mythology .People including MPs, thronged to her to hear her discourses. One  day S. D.  Upadhyaya, Nehru’s old employee, brought a letter in Hindi from Shraddha Mata. Nehru gave her an interview in the PM’s House. As her departed, I noticed ( Mathai is speaking here) that she was young, shapely and beautiful. Meetings with her became rather frequent , mostly after Nehru finished his work at night. During one of Nehru’s visits to Lucknow, Shraddha Mata turned up there, and Upadhyaya brought a letter from her as usual . Nehru sent her the reply, and she visited Nehru at …. Suddenly Shraddha Mata disappeared. In November 1949 a convent in Bangalore sent a decent looking person to Delhi with a bundle of letters. He said that a young woman from northern India arrived at the convent a few months ago and gave birth to a baby boy. She refused to divulge her name or give any particulars about herself. She left the convent as soon as she was well enough to move out but left the child behind. She however forgot to take with her a small cloth bundle in which, among other things, several letters in Hindi were found. The Mother superior, who was a foreigner , had the letters examined and was told they were from the Prime Minister. The person, who brought the letters surrendered them,. “I ( Mathai) made discreet inquiries repeatedly about the boy but failed to get a clue about his whereabouts. Convents in such matters are extremely tightlipped and secretive. Had I succeeded in locating the boy. I would have adopted him. He must have grown up as a Catholic Christian blissfully ignorant of who his father was.” Coming back to Rajiv Gandhi, we all know now that he changed his so called Paris religion to become a Catholic to marry Sania Maino of Turin, Italy. Rajiv become Roberto. His daughter’s name is Bianca and son’s name is Raul. Quite cleverly the same names are presented to the people of India as Priyanka and Rahul. What is amazing is the extent of our people’s ignorance in such matters. The press conference that Rajiv Gandhi gave in London after taking over as prime minister of India was very informative. In this press conference , Rajiv  boasted that he was NOT a Hindu but a Paris Mind you, speaking of the Paris religion, he had no Paris ancestor at all. His grandmother (father’s mother) has turned Muslim after having abandoned the Paris religion to marry Nawab Khan. It is the western press that waged a blitz of misinformation on behalf of Rajiv. From the New York Times to the Los Angles Times and the Washington Post the big guns raised Rajiv to heaven. The children’s encyclopedias recorded that Rajiv was a qualified Mechanical Engineer from the revered University of Cambridge. No doubt US kids are among the most misinformed in the world today. The reality is that in all three years of his tenure at that University Rajiv had not passed a single examination. He had therefore to leave Cambridge without a certificate. Sonia too had the same benevolent treatment. She was stated to be student in Cambridge. Such a description is calculated to mis lead Indian. She was a student in Cambridge all right but not of the University of Cambridge but of one of those fly by night language schools where foreign student come to leave English. Sonia was working as an ‘an pair’ girl in Cambridge and trying to learn English at the same time. And surprise of surprises, Rajiv was even cremated as per vedic rites in full view of India’s public. This is the Nehru dynasty that India worships and now an Italian leads a prestigious national party because of just one qualification – being married into the Nehru family.

BJP fields Jethmalani against Priya Dutt

I shouldn't be singled out: Neera Yadav

Monday, December 6, 2010

See Indian Natural empire

yogesh saxena vedic profile

“Remiss nesses of Nehru Age”, Sri M. O. Mythoi Book available on the Net , “Nehru Dynasty” of Astrologer Sri K.N.Singh, and “ Person, Passions and Politics” Mohhamad Yunus Books, the Father of Sanjay Gandhi Keeping Indira Gandhi Alias Mammuna Begum

IS IT CORRECT?, WHAT MY FRIENDS HAVE DISCLOSED TO ME THROUGH ITS SUPPORTING EVIDENCE?.  Recently, I was seeing the extracts of the passage recorded during the period, when Hyderabad Nawab threatened the Country that in case , Indians Government will ask for the merger of Hyderabad, we will Hindus ruthlessly. This has given a cold blooded murder threatening in the mind of Sri Ballabh Bhai Patel , then Home Minister a wave of the Sedition in the Mind of Muslims left in India and the incidents , which happened in Bengal during pre Independent period in 1946 on the demand of creation of Pakistan by Muslim Chief Minister. Sri Patel took it Like the treason??. Immediately , the Minster Contacted with his senior Colloquia comprising of 15 ministers and all of them suggested for conducting an attack on Hyderabad , but they soon realized that Maulana Nehru will not concede to the request along with his secrete agents inducted in the Ministry on the behest of Pro Pakistani Muslims. The Army Chief Was contacted and He had given his concurrence with a Condition that the Cabinet should given the permission to attack on Hyderabad. The cabinet meeting was called and after discussion, when the matter was placed for voting, Except Maulana Nehru , Purporting Himself to be pundit , have given their concurrence for the attack. I have been stunned to listen it and  I was at the lost to believe as I could not bear in my Mind that My mother Became Abnormal Lady on the death of J.L.Nehru and She Died due to her Shock on the death of INDIRA GANDHI AND RAHUL GANDHI, to wjich most of the ignorant citizen considered to be the HINDUS, but They were NOT???Why Jawaharlal Nehru was Reluctant to invade the traitor. The reason has been refelected after reading “Remiss nesses of Nehru Age”, Sri M. O. Mythoi Book available on the Net , “Nehru Dynasty” of Astrologer Sri K.N.Singh, and “ Person, Passions and Politics” Mohhamad Yunus Books, the Father of Sanjay Gandhi Keeping Indira Gandhi Alias Mammuna Begum as His Concubine and Gandhi Nehru Nexus, Vernacular or Secular that Nehru was a Muslims Gentleman namely GYASSUDDIN GAZI’s Grand Son and he was not born or begotten by Moti Lal Nehru , A gardener serving in the Bangle of MUBHARAK ALI , AN ADVOCATE , the proprietor of ANAND BHAWAN and Nehru was the illegitimate son  of some Muslim, either Nawab of Oudh or Some unknown person. The Nehru Dynasty Still playing a Havoc to the Innocent Person to get the utopian dream of the Agents of Death to get Our COUNTRY DHARULE HERB and to Get it Converted To Dharule ISLAM. HERE IS THE JIHADI’S CONDUCTING THE ATTACK , WHO ARE LIVING IN THIS NATION, EATING AND SHITTING INSIDE THIS COUNTRY WITH DIGNITY DUE TO OUR benevolence , BUT PLAYING A PART OF TRAITOR’S IN DEALING WITH THE PROVISIONS OF ENEMY PROPERTY ACT, 1968, JUSTICE SACCHAR COMMISSION REPORT, U.C.BANERJEE REPORT, RANG NATH MISHRA REPORT , IPL GAMES SCAM, INDUCTING CRICKERTER’S MATCH FIXING BANNED PLAYER   AZZURUDDIN  IN LOK SHABHA Common WEALTH GAMES SCAMS of 4000 CARORES, PADAM SHRI TO KAIF FOR HAVING A ROMANCE WITH KAREENA KAPOOR, M. F. Hussain Paintings, HOMA SEXUALITY MATTER, TASLIMA NASHREEN EXPULSION, KASMIR SAPERATION’S DEMAND, PROHIBITION OF THE ENTRY IN AMARNATH, GIVING HAZZ SUBSIDY, SALARIES TO THE MAULAVIES, TRUTH  SUBSIDED REGARDING THE AUTHORSHIP OF TAJ MAHAL AGRA FORT< FTEH PUR SIKRI, SIKANDARA, FALSE PROSECUTION OF VARUN GANDHI, SADHVI, MAJOR UPADHAYA, PRAMOD MUTHALIK IN CRIMINAL CASES, DEALING IN MTTER OF RAM LALA BIRTH PLACE BY  MUSLIM AND PRO MUSLIM JUDGES, 2G Spectrum Scam of 1.76 Lacks Car ores,PATRONISING FILM INDUSTRY FOR MUSLIMS ACTORS INVOLVED IN CRIME OF KILLING BLACK BUCK, PUTTING THE BRUSH IN THE PRIVATE PART OF MOTHER SARSWATI IN THE PAINTING OF M. F. HUSSAIN IN LONDON  BY SALMAN AND SHAH RUKH KHAN , GIVING INTERVIEW TO PAKISTANI CHANNEL ON 26/11 BY SHAH RUKH KHAN CONDUCTING MUTA MARRIAGE WITH MANY HINDU GIRLS,  Involvement of the CONGRESS  FLOURISHING JIHAD. THE PARTICIPATIONS OF INDIAN POLITICIANS IN 26/11 Attack, In Parliament Attack is of the INDIAN MUSLIMS, and as such Afzal and Kashab have still not hanged . IF THIS IS ALL CORRECT, THEN THE FURTHER EVIDENCE is disclosed by no other than Pakistan. 
'Surprised India' . Pakistan admits India attack link. The Mumbai attacks created new tension between India and Pakistan. IT IS THE TIME TO WAKE UP INDIANS.

yogesh saxena video collection

Yatra_Badrinath_Shri Vishnu_Part 1

Picture of Kedarnath

My Videos- My Pictures and Moovies.wmv

A slap to Indian Government and Media

Yogesh speech

Shantakumar Pc on Swiss Bank 2nd part.mp4

Thursday, December 2, 2010

AGNI PARIKSHA OF SITA: RAM SUGRIVE FRIENDSHIP PACT.. AN ANALYSIS

AGNI PARIKSHA OF SITA: RAM SUGRIVE FRIENDSHIP PACT.. AN ANALYSIS: "Shri Ram after being awarded Vanvaas for 14 years went to live in forest along with Sita and Lakshman. The main task that these three perfor..."

The Prevention of Cruelty Act, 1960, Wild Life Protection Act, 1972, The Environmental (Protection) Act, 1986, Water (Prevention And Control of Pollution) Act, 1974

The Prevention of Cruelty Act, 1960, Wild Life Protection Act, 1972, The Environmental (Protection) Act, 1986, Water (Prevention And Control of Pollution) Act, 1974 and Municipal Law meant for the protection of the society from obnoxious biodegradable substance like Caracas and Sewerage problem due to ruthless killing of the animals by the butchers in discriminatory resulting in contravention to the provisions of  sections 428 and 429 of Indian Penal Code.  Despite the request for the enforcement of the penal provision by the public at large against the people indulged in the process of degradation of the sensitivities of the children and people taught for adopting the lesson of non-violence by the spiritual personalities and also by the Father of our Nation, the Union of India and the State Government have completely failed to protect the society against the menace of the violence adopted by the criminals.  Since rampant corruption is ascending in an alarming proportion and the entire system meant for governing the nation has come to an end by the apathetic attitude of the administration at large, and so for its galloping  race could not be halted even though thousands of  Acts and Ordinances have been promulgated after the dawn of Independence, the humble applicant is now having no other options except to approach the Hon’ble Court for the enforcement of the fundamental rights guaranteed to every citizen.  This representation is filed as a predominating condition for the purposes of exercising the extraordinary equitable jurisdiction of the Hon’ble High Court under Article 226 of the constitution of India.

The provision of laws which are enforceable by the central government in exercise of their power conferred under the provision of prevention cruelity on animals act are enunciated as under;-    

The ministry of social justice and empowerment exercising its power under sub section (1) of section 38 of the Prevention of cruelty to animals act 1960 was pleased to promulgate the provision of the Prevention of cruelty to animals (slaughter house ) Rules 2000. It is provided that the slaughter means the killing
Or destruction  of animals for the purposes of food and include all  the processes and operation perform on such animals in order to prepare it for being slaughtered.

Under rule  2 ( c) slaughter house means where in 10 or more than 10 animals are slaughtered per day and duly licensed or recognized under a central, state or provincial act or any rules or regulations made there under. 

Thus the animals not to be slaughtered except in recognized or licensed houses.
It is contemplated under rule 3 of the aforesaid Rules that no person shall slaughter any animals within a municipal area except in a slaughter house recognized or licensed by the concerned authority empowered under the law for the time being in force to do so.

It is submitted that the sub rule (2) of Rule 3 provides that no animal which is pregnant, or has offspring less than three months old, or is under the age of three months or has not been certified by a veterinary doctor that it is in a fit condition to be slaughtered shall be slaughtered.

The municipal or other local authority specified the Central Government for this purpose shall, having regard to the capacity of the slaughter house and the requirement of the local population of the area in which a slaughter house is situated, determine the maximum number of animals that may be slaughtered in a day.

Under sub rule (d) of Rule 2 veterinary doctor is define as registered person under the Indian Veterinary Council Act , 1984.  The duties assigned to veterinary doctor are to examine thoroughly not more than 12 animals  in an hour and not more than 96 animals in a day and thereafter he is supposed to issue a fitness certificate in the form specified the Central Government for slaughtering an  animal.  The slaughter house shall have a reception area of adequate size sufficient for livestock  of the animal and the corpus of the animal subject to the inspection by the authorized by a veterinary doctor.

There is a further requirement that the separate isolation pens shall be provided in the slaughter house with watering and feeding arrangements for animals for animals suspected to be suffering from contagious and infectious diseases, and fractious animals, in order to segregate that from the remaining animals.  The adequate holding area shall also be provided in the slaughter house according to the class of animals to be slaughtered.  The adequate supply of the water and feeding facilities is not the only criteria but there shall be the resting ground provided to the animals.  Thus the objective enshrined behind the incorporation of these provisions is meant for not only providing a gesture of humanitarian
Criterion, but it is also implemented in order to maintain an equilibrium in the ecology cycle of the nature.

That ahinsah may be central to our world view, Yet millions of animals are battered, blinded, force-fed steroids, dissected, mutilated and eventually killed every year, often for no reason at all.  Many more are condemned to a lifetime of backbreaking slavery and then, in their old age, sent off to slaughter houses or thrown out on the streets.

Millions are killed in legal and illegal abattoirs or hunted down as easy game.  Superstition and religious rituals take an equally large number of lives.  As do myopic development projects.  Few notices because animals cannot protest.  They cannot protest when they are maimed, tortured, killed , used for experiments  and entertainment. Murdered for aphrodisiacs and fake remedies.  Forced out of their natural habitats.  Scarified to appease the gods.

Hunters, poachers, movie makers, pet shops, circus owners, drugs and cosmetics companies, fast food multinationals, dealers in furs and ivory and leather goods, exporters of live animals and meat have people to back them.  Animals do not.



Under Rule 6 it is provided that no animal shall be slaughtered in a slaughter house in sight of other animals.  No animals shall be administered any chemical, drug or hormone before slaughter except drug for its treatment from any specific disease or ailment.  The slaughter halls in a slaughter house shall provide separate sections of adequate dimensions sufficient for  slaughter of individual animals to ensure that the animal to be slaughtered is not within the sight of other animals.  Every slaughter house as soon as possible shall provide a separate  space for stunning of animals prior to slaughter, bleedings and dressings of the carcasses.  Knocking section in slaughter house may be so planned as to suit the animal and particularly the ritual slaughter, if any and such knocking section and dry landing area associated with it shall be so built that escape from this  section can be easily carried out by an operator without allowing the animal to pass the escape barrier.

That curbed-in bleeding area of adequate size as specified by the Central Government shall be provided in a slaughter house and it shall be so located that the blood could not be splashed on other animals being slaughtered or on the carcass being skinned.  The blood drain and collection in a slaughter house shall be immediate and proper.  A floor wash point shall be provided in a slaughter house for intermittent cleaning and a hand-wash basin and knife sterilize shall   also be provided for the sticker to sterilize knife and wash his hands periodically.
Dressing of carcasses in a slaughter house shall not be done on floor and adequate means and tools for dehiding or being of the animals shall be provided in a slaughter house with means for immediate disposal of hides or skins.  Hides or skins shall be immediately transported from a slaughter house either in a closed wheelbarrow or by a chute provided with self-closing door and in no case such hides or skins shall be spread on slaughter floor for inspection.  Floor wash point and adequate number of hand wash basins with sterlizer shall for immediate disposal of legs, horns, hooves and other parts of animals through spring load floor chutes or side wall doors or closed wheelbarrows and in case wheelbarrows or trucks are used in a slaughter house, care shall be taken that no point wheelbarrow or truck has to ply under the dressing rails and clear passage is provided for movement of the trucks.  Adequate space and suitable and properly located facilities shall be provided sufficient for inspection of the viscera of the various types of animals slaughtered in a slaughter house and it shall have adequate facilities for hand  washing, tool sterilization and floor washing and contrivances  for immediate separation and disposal of condemned material.  Adequate arrangements shall be made in a slaughter house by its owner for identification, inspection and correlation of carcass, viscera and head.

That under the municipal laws it is illegal to slaughter any animal for meat except in a licences slaughter house, Where a government slaughter house exists such as Idgah or Deonar, killing an animal in any other place is illegal.  Licensed slaughter houses have to observe strict ISI rules relating to hygiene and the disposal of waste matter e.g.- The need to be glass fronted to keep off flies, they must have 300 liters of water to wash the chicken etc.  Most slaughter houses ignore these rules and operate in the filthiest conditions.  A clipping of CMC banning butchers from open display of meat, the transport of meat in open vehicles .  Even the chicken stalls in your local markets are illegal.  The waste flows into the public sewers and contaminates your water supply, You can complain against them and get them shut down.  The municipal commissioner shall provide restriction for running the illegal meat shops and also against killing more than the specified number of animals.

That it is very painful and shocking that these are extremely pernicious cruelty for animals and the milk is very harmful for humans.  It is illegal under the Food and Drug Adulteration Prevention Act to give these injections, Find out from the milkman and then inform the police  and the people buying the milk and have the dairy closed down. 

It is illegal for more than 12 cows / buffaloes per bogey and even then they have to go with an attendant and have to be milk giving cows only,.  However all  old cattle are being overloaded in the hundreds after paying bribes to the station master .  These are sent for slaughter to West Bengal, make friends with a railway employee so that you can be informed when such a thing is happening .  You must stop it immediately, take the cattle off and register a case against the station master and the owner of the cattle’s.

That the transport of the animals rules 1978 were amended by the government of India the Ministry of Social Justice and empowerment on 26 Dec 2000 and made available to the public on the 1st Jan 2001 wherein chapter VII and Chapter VIII were inserted.  The transport of poultry and pigs by rail or road were prescribed.  It is provided that in transport of poultry other than day old chicks and turkey poultry by rail, road or air.  The poultry to be transported shall be healthy and in good condition and shall be examined and certified by a veterinary doctor for freedom from infectious diseases and fitness to undertake the journey.  Poultry transported in the same container shall be of the same species and of the same age group.  Poultry shall be properly fed and watered before it is placed in containers for transportation and extra feed and water shall be provided in suitable troughs fixed in the containers.  Arrangements shall be made for watering and feeding during transportation and during hot weather, watering shall be ensured every six hours.  Male stock shall not be transported with female stock in the same container.

In transport of poultry by road, rail or air.  Wire mesh or a net of any material shall not be bottom for the containers.  The container shall be properly secured to avoid pilferage.  The following instruction shall be printed on a label and fixed to the lid or printed directly on sides, namely ”Care in Transit”.  The consignee  shall be informed about the train, transport or flight number and its time of arrival well in advance.  Poultry shall not be transported continuously for more than 6 hours and whole batch shall be inspected at every 6 hours interval.  The transportation shall not remain stationary for more than 30 min and during this period, it shall be parked kin shade and arrangements shall be made for feeding and watering.  All precautions against fire shall be taken and provision of fire extinguishers in transport shall be provided.


In the respect of transport of Pigs by rail or road for the purpose of Chapter-VIII each consignment shall bear a label showing in bold red letters the name, address and telephone number (if any) of the consignor and consignee, the number and type of pigs being transported and quantity of rations and food provided to them.  The consignee shall be informed in advance about the train or vehicle in which the consignment of pigs is being sent  and its arrival time.  The consignment of pigs shall be booked by the next train or vehicle and shall not be detained after the consignment is accepted for booking.

The Calcutta Municipal Corporation (C M C) has already decided to ban open display of beef, mutton, ham, pork and fowl in meant shops from March  “It looks cruel and adversely affects the tender feeling of children.  Moreover, the scene is often nauseating to thousands of vegetarians .Butchers will now have to make arrangements for walls or thick curtains to ensure that suspended skinned goats or limbs of cows or buffaloes are not  visible to people. The restriction were imposed for carrying beef, muttons, meat and pork through carts and rickshaws.  It can only be transported in the covered van.  Every day many unauthorized  slaughtering of cows and buffaloes were witnessed by the vegetarians in the open market but after the restrictions the slaughtering of the animals came to an alarming low preposition.  It is submitted that even the alternative arrangement of slaughtering the goats  and sheep come to an abrupt halt.  The unchecked growth of chicken vendors and having cruelty upon them was becoming a menace to the society and nuisance to the public.  It is gruesome to witness chicken being hacked to death and cut it into pieces like the vegetables .  It inculcates a sense of cruelty among children  as it is done openly in the markets or on the roads.  Thus the slaughtering of chicken was also prohibited  in  the city.  Thus the conclusion is inescapable that if the will to protect the innocent animals is in the sentiments of the administration regulating the society, the implementation of legal provisions discuss above is not a difficult phenomenon.  The sensitivity of the  individual is provoked by the preaching of the great scholars and spiritual identities in  every period of the history of our great nations and its tradition.  We cannot put aside the sermons of Lord Buddha, Lord Mahavira, Swami Vivekanand, Swami  Dayanand Sarasvati and of our father of the nation after getting the independence .  There is a need for preservation of valuable heritage and to provide compassionate attitude under the glorious fundamental duties caste upon every citizen under article 51-A (g) of the he constitution of India.

That the  government of lndia in the Ministry of Social Justice and Empowerment has further promulgated the requirement for the compulsory registration of the animals performing entertainment to public under the provision performing animals (registration)Rules 2000.  The definition of the performing animals contemplated under rule 2 (h) prescribes that an animals which is used at or for the purpose of any entertainment including  a film or an equine event to which the  public are admirer. Any person desirous of training or  exhibiting a performing animal shall, within thirty days from the commencement of these rules, apply for registration to the prescribed authority and shall not exhibit or train any animal as a performing animal without being registered  under these rules

The prescribed authority while granting registration may impose such terms and conditions as it deems appropriate and shall impose the following conditions in granting registration namely /- Every owner who has ten or more such performing animals shall have a veterinarian as a regular employee for their care treatment and transport.  The owner shall not transport such animals by road continuously for more than 8 hours and except in cages admeasuring as specified in the fifth Schedule.  The owner shall ensure proper watering and feeding halts during such transportation.  The owner after transportation shall provide feeding and retiring enclosures in respect of the animals specified in the Sixth Schedule.  The owner shall ensure that any animal is not inflicted unnecessary pain or suffering before or during or after its training or exhibition.  The owner shall not deprive the animal of feed or water in order to compel the said animal to train or perform any trick.  The owner shall train an animal as a performing animal to perform an act in accordance with its basic natural instinct.  The owner shall not make a performing animal perform if it is sick or injured or pregnant.  The owner shall ensure that no sudden loud noise is deliberately  created within the vicinity of any performing animal or bring an animal  close  to fire, which may frighten the animal.   

The owner in case the performing animal is to be exhibited under artificial light, the overall intensity of such light shall not be more than 500 LUX.  The owner shall not subject the animals to any action, which may either kill or injure or use the animal in scenes that may cause injury to the animals.  The owner shall not use any tripping device, wires, or pitfalls for such animals.  The animals shall not expose any animal to either burning fire or to fire accidents.  The owner shall not keep any animal including horses in close proximity while shooting scenes involving explosives or other loud noises.  The owner shall ensure that props such not cause injury to the animals during the performance.  The owner shall ensure that the equines are not made to walk on hard surfaces without being shoed and shall further ensure that the animals are not used in downhill slides or rodeo slide stops without proper skid and hock boots.  The owner of any equine shall not use any whip other than an air cushioned shock absorbing whip which has been scientifically tested to prove that it will not cause wears, bruising or other damage to the horse and subject to the conditions that- (a) the whip shall not have raised binding, stitching, seam or flap,  (b) the whip shall be used by licensed jockeys only. (c) the owner shall also ensure that the whip is not used other than either on the quarters in either the forehand or the backhand position or down the shoulder in the backhand position or use the whip with the arm above shoulder height (d) the whip shall not be used more than 3 times in a race.

The owner shall ensure that the animal is not used on floors that are very smooth without the use of non-skidding mats. The owner shall ensure that large gathering of animals is not allowed in such a way which may cause or result in stampede to the animals.  The owner shall ensure that the animal is not made or incited to fight against other animals and shall further ensure that sedatives or tranquilizers or steroids or any other artificial enhances are not administered to or inserted in any animal except the anesthesia by a veterinary doctor for the purpose of treatment of an injured or sick animal.  The owner shall ensure that the animal shall not be transported or be kept or confined in cages and receptacles which do not measure in height, length or breadth as specified under the Transport of Animal Rules, 1978, the Recognition of Zoo Rules, 1992 or under any other Act, rule or order for this purpose.  The owner shall ensure that the animal is not continuously used for excessive number of takes in shooting a film without providing adequate rest to the animal and in the event of a snake being used it shall not be made to ingest any substances or made to crawl across tarred or any other heatened surface and shall not be contorted to wrestle. The owner shall ensure that while using an animal in shooting a film, the fight sequence shall not be shot in any livestock holding area including poultry area and shall further ensure that no birds are shown in cages. The owner shall inform the prescribed authority at least four weeks in advance informing the place, date and time of the actual making of the film wherein the animal is to be used. 

The provisions  of aforesaid rules banning the training and exhibitions of an animals formulated under provision of sections 22 of prevention of cruelty animals Act were challenged as violetive of article 14, 19 (1)(g) and 21 of constitution of India before Hon’ble Kerela High Court in N.R. Nair vs. Union of India (AIR 2000 Kerela 340).  The Hon’ble High Court was pleased to observe that “It is a fallacy to think that under our Constitution there are only rights and no duties.  The provisions in Part IV enable the Legislatures to impose various duties on the citizens.  The mandate of our Constitution is to build a welfare society and that object may be achieved to the extent the Directive principles are implemented by legislation.”

If so, in determining the constitutionality of such laws, when enacted, the Court should have regard to the Directives as well as the fundamental duties along with the fundamental rights.  The Courts may also look at the duties while interpreting equivocal status which, admit of two constructions and also uphold the constitutionality of a statute the object of which is in consonance with a provision in Article 51 A – vide Mohan v Union of India, 1992 Supp. (1) SCC 594 (AIR 1991 SC 1150). Viewed in the above perspective, the impugned notification has to be upheld as one in furtherance of the object of the fundamental duty of a citizen to have compassion for animals and to refrain from inflicting unnecessary pain and suffering on them.

Progress and retrogression punctuate the story of mankind. Empires have risen and crashed into the dust of history. Civilizations have flourished, reached their peak and passed away. "and yet time has his revolution, there must be a period and an end of all temporal things,  an end of names and dignities, and whatsoever is terrene."
The law exists to serve the needs of the society, which is governed by it. If the law is to play its allotted role of serving the needs of the society, it must reflect the ideas and ideologies of that society. It must keep time with the heartbeats of the society and with the needs and aspirations of the people. As the society changes, the law cannot remain immutable. Sydney Smith, said, "When I hear any man talk of an unalterable law. I am convinced that he is an unalterable fool." The law must, therefore, in a changing society march in tune with the changed ideas and ideologies. Legislatures are, however, not best fitted for the role of adapting the law to the necessities of the time, for the legislative process is too slow and the legislatures often divided by politics, slowed down by periodic elections and overburdened with myriad other legislative activities. A constitutional document is even less suited to this task, for the philosophy and the ideologies underlying it must of necessity be expressed in broad and general terms and the process of amending a Constitution is too cumbersome and consuming to meet the immediate needs. This task must, therefore of necessity fall upon the courts because the courts can by the process of judicial interpretation adapt the law to suit the needs of the society.



The cycle of change and experiment, rise and fall, growth and decay, and of progress and retrogression recurs endlessly in the history of man and the history of civilization. T. S. Eliot in the First Chorus from "The Rock" said :
"0 perpetual revolution of configured stars,
0 perpetual recurrence of determined seasons,
0 world of spring and autumn, birth and dying!
The endless cycle of idea and action,
Endless invention, endless experiment".

"It is something to show that the consistency of a system requires a particular result, but it is not all. The life of the law has not been logic: it has been experience. The felt necessities of the time, the prevalent moral and political theories, intuitions of public policy, avowed or unconscious, even the prejudices which judges share with their fellow-men, have had a good deal more to do than the syllogism in determining the rules by which men should be governed. The law embodies the story of a nation's development through many centuries, and it cannot be dealt with as if it contained only the axioms and corollaries of a book of mathematics. In order to know what it is, we must know what it has been. and what it tends to become. We must alternately consult history and existing theories of legislation. But the most difficult labor will be to understand the combination of the two into new products at every stage. The substance of the law at any given time pretty nearly corresponds, so far as it goes, with what is then understood to be convenient; but its form and machinery, and the degree to which it is able to work out desired results, depend very much upon its past."

The framers of our Constitution were men of vision and ideals, and many of them. had suffered in the cause of freedom. They wanted an idealistic and philosophic base upon which to raise the administrative superstructure of the Constitution., They, therefore, headed our Constitution with a preamble which declared India's goal and inserted Parts III and IV in the Constitution.

"It may not be possible to frame an exhaustive definition of what executive function means and implies. Ordinarily the executive power connotes the residue of governmental functions that remain after legislative and judicial functions are taken away. The Indian Constitution has not indeed recognized the doctrine of separation of powers in its absolute rigidity but the functions of the different parts or branches of the Government have been sufficiently differentiated and consequently it can very well be said that our Constitution does not contemplate assumption, by one organ or part of the State, of functions that essentially belong to another. The executive indeed can exercise the powers of departmental or subordinate legislation when such powers are delegated to it by the legislature. It can also, when so empowered, exercise judicial functions in a limited way. The executive Government, however, can never go against the provisions of the Constitution or of any law. This is clear from the provisions of Article 154 of the Constitution but, as we have already stated, it does not follow from this that in order to enable the executive to function there must be a law already in existence and that the powers of the executive are limited merely to the carrying out of these laws."

                          The framers of our Constitution did not, however, want to frame for the Sovereign Democratic Republic, which was to emerge from their labour, a Constitution in the strict legal sense. They were aware that there were other Constitutions that had given expression to certain ideals as the goal towards which the country should strive and which had defined the principles considered fundamental to the governance of the country. They were aware of the events that had culminated in the Charter of the United Nations. They were aware that the General Assembly of the United Nations had adopted the Universal Declaration of Human Rights, for India was a signatory to it. They were aware that the Universal Declaration of Human Rights contained certain basic and fundamental rights, appertaining to all men. They were aware that these rights were born of the philosophical speculations of the Greek and Roman Stoics and nurtured by the jurists of ancient Rome. They were aware that these rights had found expression in a limited form in the accords entered into between the rulers and their powerful nobles. For instance, the accord of 1188 entered into between King Alfonso IX and the Cortes of Leon, the Magna Carta of 1215 wrested from King John of England by his barons on the Meadow of Runnymede . He was compelled to- affix his Great Seal on a small island in the Thames in Buckinghamshire - still called Magna Carta Island, and the guarantees which King Andrew 11 of Hungary was forced to give by his Golden Bull of 1822. They were aware of the international treaties of the mid-seventeenth century for safeguarding the right of religious freedom and the rights of aliens.

 They were aware of the full blossoming of the concept of Human Rights in the writings of the "philosophers" such as Voltaire, Rousseau, Diderot, Rayal, d'Alembert and others, and of the concrete expression given to it in the various Declarations of Rights of the American Colonies (particularly Virginia) and in the American Declaration of Independence. They were aware that in 1789, during the early years of the French Revolution, the French National Assembly had in "The Declaration of the Rights of Man and of the Citizen" proclaimed these rights in lofty words and that Revolutionary France had translated them into practice with bloody deeds. They were aware of the treaties entered into between various States in the nineteenth century providing protection for religious and other minorities. They were aware that these rights had at last found universal recognition in the Universal Declaration of Human Rights. They were aware that the first ten Amendments to the Constitution of the United States of America contained certain rights akin to Human Rights. They knew that the Constitution of Eire contained a chapter headed "Fundamental Rights" and another headed "Directive Principles of State Policy". They were aware that the Constitution of Japan also contained a chapter headed "Rights and Duties of the People". They were aware that the major traditional functions of the State have been the defiance of its territory and its inhabitants against external aggression, the maintenance of law and order, the administration of justice, the levying of taxes and the collection of revenue. They were also aware, that increasingly, and particularly in modem times, several States have assumed numerous and wide-ranging functions, especially in the fields of education, health, social security, control and maintenance of natural resources and natural assets, transport and communication services, and operation of certain industries considered basic to the economy and growth of the nation.
No institution in the republic has a history so continuous and so successful as that of judicial institution. The normative and the factual aspect associated in legal system are closely interacting with each other. A legal system is playing a role between social ideals and social realities. Judicial institution is not born of a revaluation, but has been evolved gradually by struggle and develop through epochs of toil and tears contributed by the members of the Bar. This is like a transformation of a tree from the seed.

Judicial review has I think developed to a stage today when without reiterating any analysis of the steps by which the development has come about, one can conveniently classify under three heads the grounds on which administrative action is subject to would call ’illegality’ the second ‘irrationality’ and the third ‘procedural impropriety’ That is not, to say that further development on a case by case basis may not in course of time add further grounds.  I have in mind particularly the possible adoption in the future of the principle of ‘proportionality’ which is recognized in the administrative law of several of our fellow members of the European Economic Community; but to dispose of the instant case the three already well established heads that I have mention will surface.”

“No citizen has a fundamental right to trade in ivory or ivory articles, whether indigenous or imported.  Assuming trade in ivory to be  fundamental right granted under Article 19 (1) (g), the prohibition imposed thereon by the impugned Act is in public interest and in consonance with the moral claims embodied in Article 48 A of the Constitution; and the ban on trade in imported ivory and articles made therefrom is not violative of Article 14 of the Constitution and does not suffer from the mala fides namely, unreasonableness, unfairness and arbitrariness.”

This judgement has been affirmed by the Hon’ble Supreme Court in N.R. Nair and others v Union of India (2001) 6 S.C.C 84.  The Hon’ble Supreme Court has helped that keeping the Preamble of the Act and Section 24 in view it is clear it is the welfare of the animals which is of paramount consideration and it is only if the Government is satisfied on the basis of the materials on record that unnecessary pain or suffering is inflicted on an animal during the course of training or at  the time  when it is exhibited that a notification under Section 22/(II) is issued.  Implicit in Section 22 is the necessity for the Government to come to the conclusion that if a notification under the said section is not  issued there would be unnecessary pain or suffering in the training or exhibition of the animals.  The existence of the said fact is precondition to the issuance of  the notification. Therefore, the power contained in Section 22 cannot be said to be unguided.  In exercise of judicial review, neither the High Court nor the Supreme Court can go into the correctness of the decision of the Government in issuing the impugned notification.  The Govt. cannot be said to have acted irresponsibly or have not taken into account all the evidence which was placed before it and the High Court has referred to extracts thereof which shows the manner in which the animals are trained or ill-trained.  Thus the impugned notification is within the parameters of the Prevention of Cruelty to Animals Act.

In the context of our national dimensions of human rights, right to life, liberty, pollution, free air and water is guaranteed by the Constitution under Articles 21, 48A and 51 (g), it is the duty of the State to take effective steps to protect the guaranteed constitutional rights.

"Democratic and aristocratic States are not in their own nature free. Political liberty is to be found only in moderate governments; and even in these it is not always found. It is there only when there is no abuse of power. But constant experience shows us that every man invested with power is apt to abuse it, and to carry his authority as far as it will go. Is it not strange, though true, to say that virtue itself has need of limits?. In every government there are three sorts of powers : the legislative the executive in respect of things dependent on the law of nations and the executive in regard to matters that depend on the civil law..

No right is absolute in a welfare state.  Man is a social animal .  He cannot live without the cooperation of large number of person.  Thus when there is a clash between two fundamental rights, the right which would advance the public morality or the public interest would alone be enforced through the process of Court.  Moral consideration can be kept at bay.  Judges are not excepted to sit at mute structures of clay in the hall known as Court Room, but have to be sense that they must keep their finger firmly upon the pulse of the accepted morality of the day.
"The functions of Government under our system are apportioned. The legislative department has been committed the duty of making laws; to the executive the duty of executing them : and to the judiciary, the duty of interpreting and applying them in cases properly brought before the Courts. The general rule is that neither department may invade the province of the other, and neither may control, direct, or restrain the action of the others." It is also well to remember that freedom depends upon the separation of three organs of the State.,, Each must function within its own domain and remain distinct.
. Judicial review of the administrative action or inaction where there is an obligation for action should be with caution and not in haste. Its sense of priority it has determined, there may have been certain lethargy and inaction. It has been said by Adam Smith in his 'Wealth of Nation' that whenever you see poverty widespread rest assured that either of the two causes must have operated, either energy has not been applied or energy has been misapplied.

"The judge, even when he is free, is still not wholly free. He is not to innovate at pleasure. He is not a knight-errant roaming at will in pursuit of his own ideal of beauty or of goodness. He is to draw his inspiration from consecrated principles. He is not to yield to spasmodic sentiment, to vague and unregulated benevolence. He is to exercise a discretion informed by tradition, methodized by analogy, disciplined by system, and subordinated to "the primordial necessity of order in the social life." Wide enough in all conscience is the field of discretion that remains."

The judicial system is based on the cooperation of the administration.  It is well settled preposition of jurisprudence that every right has a corresponding duty upon the enforcing agencies regulated by the sovereignty of the State Government. Thus the enforcement of the provisions of the law and statutory provision is not only the responsibility of the Hon’ble Courts meant for the enforcement of constitutional right but it is an elementary duty of the official assigned with the responsibility make the enforcement of the Public order.  There is a comedy of error in our celebrated principles that those person who are made accountable for the enforcement of law, are themselves violative the public order for extraneous consideration.
Certainly judicial institutions must reflect the traditions, ideals and assumptions, and in the end must respond to the needs, claims and expectations of the social order in which they operate. They must not and ultimately cannot, move too far ahead or lag too far behind. The problem for the Supreme Court is one of finding of the proper degree of responsiveness and leadership or perhaps better, of short-term and long-term responsiveness. Yet, in seeking out this position the Court should not under-estimate the authority and prestige it has achieved over the years. Representing the conscience of the community" it has come to possess a very real power to keep alive and vital the higher values and goals towards which our society imperfectly strives Given its prestige, it would appear that the power of the Court to protect freedom of expression is unlikely to be substantially curtailed unless the whole structure of our democratic institutions is threatened"


  The Court of law has become the mute spectator of the melody prevalent in the society in absence of fixing accountability of such officer who are guilty of violating the law.  There is no fear in the mind of the public.  The invasion of law is common phenomenon.  The people have given up there basic instinct for the enforcement of social obligation and rather they have now dragged in the process of participating with such person who are the offender and invaders to the society at large.  Thus the entire society has now become an association of dreaded criminals.  There is no frustration in the mind of  the public at large even to go behind the bar of jail if the same is having the attractive venture for the purposes of getting the predomination in the society.
The Constitution enshrines and guarantees the rule of law and the power of the High Courts under Art. 226 (which is equally true of Art. 32) is designed to ensure that each and every authority in the State, including the Government acts bona fide and within the limits of its powers and that when a Court is satisfied that there is an abuse or misuse of power and its jurisdiction is invoked, it is incumbent on the Court to afford justice to the individual. The Court further observed that in such an event the fact that the authority concerned denies the charge of mala fide, or asserts the absence of oblique motives or of its having taken into consideration improper or irrelevant matter, does not preclude the Court from inquiring into the truth of the allegations made against the authority and affording appropriate relief to the party aggrieved by such illegality or of use of power in the event of the allegations being made out.
There is a growing body of authority, attributable in large part to the efforts of Lord Denning, to the effect that in some circumstances when public bodies and officers, in their dealings with a citizen, take it upon themselves to assume authority on a matter concerning him, the citizen is entitled to rely on their having the authority that they have asserted if he cannot reasonably be expected to know the limits of that authority; and he should not be required to suffer for his reliance if they lack the necessary authority."



 The police force which was once being considered to be the protector of the public at large has now starting acting in a manner as it has now meant for ruining the society.  There is a fear in the mind of the public even to pass through the police station as they have their genuine apprehension that they may be booked in some false cases.  This is the reason why the people has now taken the resort to approach the Hon’ble Court even for the enforcement for the such rights having the sanctity of law.  This representation is given in anticipation that the higher authority under the benevolent jurisdiction may rise to the occasion as the applicant may not be enforced to seek the protection against the redress of their grievance for the enforcement of law of prevention of cruelty of animal through the court of law.
                                                                                          

The humble applicant without attributing any aspersion upon the administration is concerned with the aspect of maintaining any equilibrium in the environment by protecting the animals who are not only our friend for the ecological cycle of the nature but the human being is also dependent upon them.  The foundation of the country are based on the principle of non-violence and compassionate attitude towards the life of defenseless innocent animals.  The slaughter of an animal by the human being shows the aggressive trend of some irrational tendency of cruelty.  Ultimately such country who have no policy for extracting the meat and other means of preparing the non-vegetarian dishes for pacifying the appetite of the taste have faced the desert and other natural calamity.  This is not a matter of faith or ideology of any religion to commit an offense of the slaughter in an unsystematic manner but ultimately the instinct of killing is a crime.  Thus the government is duty bound to respect the laws prohibiting any such cruelty of the innocent birds and cattle’s on the public street.  There is also a danger of inviting a trouble of psychological depression in the mind of a child who has been born in the atmosphere of live and let live based on non-violence.  Thus kindly implement the proper application of the provision of the law just to save the cruelty on animals. 

This country has given so many scholar professing the slogan of non-violence upon the weaker animals.  There are instances when an  animal was found to be more coordinate and disciplined then the human being in the society.  There is crime committed  by the animal upon other animal.  It is always found that whenever the man has shown himself to be an aggressor, it is only in such situation that the animals have hurted  the human being and in that process sometime the fatal injury would have been resulting in the death of the human being.  However on the comparative assessment of the situation it is always found that the attempts made by the animals upon the life of human being are to a very limited extent in compared to the attack made by the human being.  Thus it is also the right of  conscience, faith and religion of the other vegetarian human being conferred under Article 25 of the constitution of India which is flauted by the inaction of the part of the public administration in this regard.

Thus the applicant expect that after  receiving this representation the humble and bonafide authorities assigned with the responsibility of saving the transquality, peace  and harmony in the society may rise up to the extent of making the enforceability of legal provision contain under the prevention of cruelty upon animal act.  Each soul is potentially divine.  The divinity is within one’s nature either external work or philosophy or internal by worship or meditation.  Sometime the human being is blessed with both the virtues.  This is the ultimate goal of life and since the religion represent itself the society by an artificial creation of God, the God and Goddess of Hindu religion are  having the symbolic resemblance as identical to God existence.  This is why the rivers, trees, plants and animals including the Cows are worship in home of every Hindu.  It is significant that even the poisonous are respected by the people at large with the same spirit as there were worshipping of the God.  Thus the directions may be issued for the purposes of enforcement of the legal provision to the sub-ordinate authority and any person indulge in the infringement of such guideline may be dealt with by appropriate imprisonment.  The licence of the slaughter house may also be revoked by the authority.

Thus it is most respectfully submitted that your Honour may graciously be pleased have the effective enforcement of the provision of the law in this regard.  The applicant has submitted  this representation in  anticipation of the redress of his grievances failing which the applicant may have no other options  except  to approach the Hon’ble Court for the enforcement of the rule of law in the society.  The appropriate  remedy of filing the public interest litigation will be the only recourse open with the applicant in this regard.          


                                                                                     
YOGESH KUMAR SAXENA, ADVOCATE, HIGH COURT, ALLAHABAD.
R/o -H. I .G. 203, Preetam Nagar, Sulem Sarai, Allahabad, U. P., India.